Surgical management of acute appendicitis during the European COVID-19 second wave: safe and effective.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic drove acute care surgeons to pivot from long established practice patterns. Early safety concerns regarding increased postoperative complication risk in those with active COVID infection promoted antibiotic-driven non-operative therapy for select conditions ahead of an evidence-base. Our study assesses whether active or recent SARS-CoV-2 positivity increases hospital length of stay (LOS) or postoperative complications following appendectomy. METHODS: Data were derived from the prospective multi-institutional observational SnapAppy cohort study. This preplanned data analysis assessed consecutive patients aged ≥ 15 years who underwent appendectomy for appendicitis (November 2020-May 2021). Patients were categorized based on SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity: no infection, active infection, and prior infection. Appendectomy method, LOS, and complications were abstracted. The association between SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity and complications was determined using Poisson regression, while the association with LOS was calculated using a quantile regression model. RESULTS: Appendectomy for acute appendicitis was performed in 4047 patients during the second and third European COVID waves. The majority were SARS-CoV-2 uninfected (3861, 95.4%), while 70 (1.7%) were acutely SARS-CoV-2 positive, and 116 (2.8%) reported prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. After confounder adjustment, there was no statistically significant association between SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity and LOS, any complication, or severe complications. CONCLUSION: During sequential SARS-CoV-2 infection waves, neither active nor prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with prolonged hospital LOS or postoperative complication. Despite early concerns regarding postoperative safety and outcome during active SARS-CoV-2 infection, no such association was noted for those with appendicitis who underwent operative management.

Are Spanish surgeons prepared to treat trauma patients? Multicentre descriptive observational study.

PURPOSE: Specific training in the management of trauma patients is beneficial for surgeons. Training through specific courses in this area has a direct impact on the care of these patients. The aim of this work is to understand the participation and specific training in the care of trauma patients by Spanish surgeons. METHODS: A national survey was conducted and administered to all members of the Spanish Association of Surgeons. The survey assessed their degree of participation in emergency surgery, and therefore the probability of attending trauma patients, their assessment of the initial care of trauma patients in their centre, and their specific training in this field. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 510 surgeons from 47 Spanish provinces, with Catalonia and Andalusia being the most represented regions. In total, 456 (89.41%) of those surveyed work in the emergency department on a routine basis. Only 171 (33.53%) refer to having a registry of trauma patients in their hospital. While 79.02% of surgeons reported that general surgeons are not involved in care of severe trauma from the outset, only 66.47% have completed the ATLS course, 40.78% the DSTC course and 18.82% the MUSEC course. Despite this, 85.69% believe that the ATLS course should be compulsory during residency and 43.33% believe that severe trauma care in their hospital is poor or very poor. CONCLUSION: Only 40% have received specific training in definitive surgical management of severe trauma. Despite this, a large percentage of surgeons work in the emergency department on a routine basis and potentially face the challenge of managing these patients.

Eight-year analysis of bullfighting injuries in Spain, Portugal and southern France.

Improving knowledge on the epidemiology and analysing the prognostic factors of severity for injuries caused by fighting bulls in Spain, Portugal and southern France. Observational retrospective study including 1239 patients with a reported history of bull horn injuries between January 2012 and November 2019 in Spain, Portugal or southern France. A multiple logistic regression test was used to analyse the prognostic factors of severity and mortality rate of these lesions. The mean accident rate was 9.13% and the mortality rate was 0.48%. The most frequent mechanism of trauma was goring, and the commonest locations of the lesions were thigh and groin. Vascular lesion was found in 20% of thigh/groin gorings. Prognostic factors of severity were vascular lesion, head trauma, fracture, goring injuries and age of the animal. The most reliable prognostic factors of mortality were vascular lesion and goring in the back. Lesions caused by fighting bulls are common in the bullfighting events held in Spain, Portugal and southern France. Although the mortality rate is low, there is a higher morbidity rate, which is conditioned by vascular lesion. All medical teams should include a surgeon experienced in vascular surgery and an anaesthesiologist.

European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) recommendations for trauma and emergency surgery preparation during times of COVID-19 infection.

A series of recommendations regarding hospital perioperative preparation for the COVID-19 pandemic were compiled to inform surgeons worldwide on how to provide emergency surgery and trauma care during enduring times.The recommendations are divided into eight domains: (1) General recommendation for surgical services; (2) Emergency Surgery for critically ill COVID-19 positive or suspected patients -Preoperative planning and case selection; (3) Operating Room setup; (4) patient transport to the OR; (5) Surgical staff preparation; (6) Anesthesia considerations; (7) Surgical approach; and (8) Case Completion.The European Society of Emergency Surgery board endorsed these recommendations.

Correction to: Surgeon-performed point-of-care ultrasound for acute cholecystitis: indications and limitations: a European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) consensus statement.

Unfortunately, the author Luca Ponchietti was omitted in the original publication. Please find the correct author list here.

Surgeon-performed point-of-care ultrasound for acute cholecystitis: indications and limitations: a European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) consensus statement.

BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis (AC), frequently responsible for presentation to the emergency department, requires expedient diagnosis and definitive treatment by a general surgeon. Ultrasonography, usually performed by radiology technicians and reported by radiologists, is the first-line imaging study for the assessment of AC. Targeted point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), particularly in the hands of the treating surgeon, may represent an evolution in surgical decision-making and may expedite care, reducing morbidity and cost. METHODS: This consensus guideline was written under the auspices of the European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) by the POCUS working group. A systematic literature search identified relevant papers on the diagnosis and treatment of AC. Literature was critically-appraised according to the GRADE evidence-based guideline development method. Following a consensus conference at the European Congress of Trauma & Emergency Surgery (Valencia, Spain, May 2018), final recommendations were approved by the working group, using a modified e-Delphi process, and taking into account the level of evidence of the conclusion. RECOMMENDATIONS: We strongly recommend the use of ultrasound as the first-line imaging investigation for the diagnosis of AC; specifically, we recommend that POCUS may be adopted as the primary imaging adjunct to surgeon-performed assessment of the patient with suspected AC. In line with the Tokyo guidelines, we strongly recommend Murphy's sign, in conjunction with the presence of gallstones and/or wall thickening as diagnostic of AC in the correct clinical context. We conditionally recommend US as a preoperative predictor of difficulty of cholecystectomy. There is insufficient evidence to recommend contrast-enhanced ultrasound or Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of AC. We conditionally recommend the use of ultrasound to guide percutaneous cholecystostomy placement by appropriately-trained practitioners. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons have recently embraced POCUS to expedite diagnosis of AC and provide rapid decision-making and early treatment, streamlining the patient pathway and thereby reducing costs and morbidity.

Thorax Trauma Severity Score: Is it reliable for Patient's Evaluation in a Secondary Level Hospital?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the predictive and diagnostic value of thorax trauma severity score (TTSS) in a population of thoracic trauma patients admitted to a secondary level trauma center. METHODS: A Retrospective analysis of patients admitted over a period of two years with IDC-9 codes related to thoracic trauma was undertaken. The association of TTSS with complications and mortality was evaluated. We also determined the predictive value of TTSS using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). RESULTS: 238 patients with thoracic trauma, mostly middle-aged (62.2 ± 15 years), were included. The main mechanisms of injury were falls and traffic accidents. Thirty-three patients had important extra-thoracic injuries, but only 9 presented an ISS> 15. The average ISS was 3 ± 5; Morbidity was 2.5% and mortality was 2.1% as a result of thoracic injury and these patients had significantly higher TTSS values. Each score component was analyzed separately, showing significant association with complications and mortality. The area under the curve for TTSS was significant for predicting complications (0.848) and mortality (0.856) values. TTSS with a cut off value of 8 points had a sensitivity of 66% and specificity of 94% to predict complications and 80% sensitivity and 94% specificity for predicting mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The TTSS is an appropriate and feasible tool to predict the development of complications or mortality in a population of mostly mild thoracic trauma.

Isquemia mesentérica aguda por trombosis venosa en paciente portador de mutación Leiden del factor V / Acute mesenteric ischemia caused by venous thrombosis in a patient with Leiden V factor mutation

No disponible

Estudio del valor predictivo de la revisión primaria y de las exploraciones complementarias para anticipar la necesidad de intervención quirúrgica en pacientes con heridas de arma blanca en el torso / A study of the predictive value of the primary review and complementary examinations in assessing the need for surgery in patients with stab wounds in the torso

Introducción La observación es el patrón oro del tratamiento de heridas de arma blanca en pacientes estables. El objetivo del estudio fue analizar el valor de la exploración física inicial y de las exploraciones complementarias ante la necesidad de cirugía, para disminuir tiempos de observación. Material y métodos Estudio retrospectivo de un registro prospectivo de pacientes politraumáticos, seleccionando heridas de arma blanca troncales. Se analizan parámetros clínicos y diagnósticos. La variable principal es la necesidad de cirugía. Resultados Entre 2006 y 2009 se incluyó a 198 pacientes, con injury severity score medio de 7,8 ± 7 y mortalidad del 0,5%. El 52% sufrieron heridas múltiples que se distribuyeron en cervicales 23%, torácicas 46% y abdominales 31%. Precisaron intervención quirúrgica 73 pacientes (37%), siendo el 59% inmediata, 27% precoz y 14% tardía. La necesidad de intervención se asoció a un menor revised trauma score, evisceración, hemorragia activa o constatación de herida penetrante. Las hemoglobinas iniciales, a las 2 y 12 h fueron significativamente inferiores en pacientes quirúrgicos. La tomografía computarizada (TC) positiva se asoció a intervención. Un 18% de pacientes presentaron complicaciones, concentradas en los pacientes quirúrgicos. Las intervenciones tardías no presentaron más complicaciones que las inmediatas (p = 0,72). El 10% de los pacientes con exploración física y complementarias normales precisaron cirugía y el 6% desarrollaron complicaciones. Conclusión Ningún parámetro fisiológico o analítico guía de forma individual la necesidad de intervención. La exploración física seriada es la maniobra diagnóstica más importante para decidir intervención, pero la TC puede usarse de forma liberal. Una observación de 24 h es recomendable en pacientes con heridas penetrantes (AU)

Introduction Observation is the gold standard for stable patients with stab wounds. The aim of the study was to analyse the value of the primary review and complementary examinations to predict the need for surgery in stab wound patients in order to decrease observation times. Methods A retrospective study of stab wound patients recorded in a database. Clinical and diagnostic workup parameters were analysed. The main variable was the need for surgery. Results A total of 198 patients were included between 2006 and 2009, with a mean injury severity score (ISS) of 7.8 ± 7, and 0.5% mortality. More than half (52%) of the patients suffered multiple wounds. Wound distribution was 23% neck, 46% thorax and 31% abdomen. Surgery was required in 73 (37%) patients (59% immediate, 27% delayed and 14% delayed). The need for surgery was associated with a lower revised trauma score (RTS), evisceration, active bleeding, and fascial penetration. Initial and control haemoglobin levels were significantly lower in patients who required surgery. A positive computerised tomography (CT) scan was associated with surgery. There were complications in 18% of patients, and they were more frequent in those who underwent surgery. There was no difference in complication rates between immediate and delayed (P=.72). Surgery was finally required in 10% of the patients with no abnormalities in the primary review and diagnostic workup, and 6% of those developed complications. Conclusion None of the parameters studied could individually assess the need for surgery. Primary and secondary reviews were the most important diagnostic tool, but CT scan should be used more often. An observation period of 24 hours is recommended in torso penetrating wounds (AU)

[A study of the predictive value of the primary review and complementary examinations in assessing the need for surgery in patients with stab wounds in the torso]. / Estudio del valor predictivo de la revisión primaria y de las exploraciones complementarias para anticipar la necesidad de intervención quirúrgica en pacientes con heridas de arma blanca en el torso.

INTRODUCTION: Observation is the gold standard for stable patients with stab wounds. The aim of the study was to analyse the value of the primary review and complementary examinations to predict the need for surgery in stab wound patients in order to decrease observation times. METHODS: A retrospective study of stab wound patients recorded in a database. Clinical and diagnostic workup parameters were analysed. The main variable was the need for surgery. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients were included between 2006 and 2009, with a mean injury severity score (ISS) of 7.8±7, and 0.5% mortality. More than half (52%) of the patients suffered multiple wounds. Wound distribution was 23% neck, 46% thorax and 31% abdomen. Surgery was required in 73 (37%) patients (59% immediate, 27% delayed and 14% delayed). The need for surgery was associated with a lower revised trauma score (RTS), evisceration, active bleeding, and fascial penetration. Initial and control haemoglobin levels were significantly lower in patients who required surgery. A positive computerised tomography (CT) scan was associated with surgery. There were complications in 18% of patients, and they were more frequent in those who underwent surgery. There was no difference in complication rates between immediate and delayed (P=.72). Surgery was finally required in 10% of the patients with no abnormalities in the primary review and diagnostic workup, and 6% of those developed complications. CONCLUSION: None of the parameters studied could individually assess the need for surgery. Primary and secondary reviews were the most important diagnostic tool, but CT scan should be used more often. An observation period of 24 hours is recommended in torso penetrating wounds.

Quiste de uraco sobreinfectado como diagnóstico diferencial poco frecuente de apendicitis aguda / Infected urachal cyst as an unusual differential diagnosis of acute appendicitis

No disponible

No disponible

Tratamiento del dolor anal por patología anorrectal aguda en urgencias: ¿baños de asiento con agua fría o caliente? resultados de un ensayo clínico aleatorizado / Cold or hot sitz baths in the emergency t

Introducción: La creencia popular propugna el uso de baños de asiento con agua fría para el tratamiento del dolor anal agudo, pero las guías de práctica clínica recomiendan el uso de agua caliente por su efecto conocido sobre la presión anal de reposo. Objetivo: El objetivo fue estudiar el efecto analgésico, sobre la calidad de vida, datos de manometría y evolución clínica, de 2 temperaturas en los baños de asiento en enfermos con dolor anal. Material y métodos: Ensayo clínico aleatorizado en pacientes con dolor anal agudo por enfermedad hemorroidal o fisura anal divididos en Grupo 1: baños de asiento con agua a Ta inferior a 15°C y Grupo 2: baños con agua a Tasuperior a 30°C. La analgesia fue la misma en ambos grupos. Se analizó: el dolor durante 7 días (escala visual analógica), calidad de vida (SF-36), presión anal de reposo y evolución de la enfermedad. Resultados: De 27 pacientes elegibles, 24 fueron aleatorizados (Grupo 1: n=12 y Grupo 2: n=12). El dolor no mostró diferencias estadísticamente significativas, pero se mantuvo estable en el Grupo 1 y por el contrario fue disminuyendo progresivamente en los pacientes del Grupo 2, siendo la diferencia en los valores del dolor del primer día respecto al séptimo superior en el Grupo 2 (p=0,244). El resto de variables fueron similares. Conclusión: No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en el control del dolor del 1.er al 7 día en el Grupo con baños de asiento con agua caliente (AU)

Introduction: The popular belief advocates the use of sitz (sitting) baths with cold water for the treatment of acute anal pain, but clinical practice guides recommend the use of hot water for its known effect on the at-rest anal pressure. Aim: The objective of the study was to examine the analgesic effect on the quality of life, manometer data and clinical progress, of the two temperatures in sitz baths in patients with anal pain. Material and methods: A randomised clinical trial on patients with acute anal pain due to haemorrhoids or anal fissures, divided into Group 1: Sitz baths with water at a temperature of less than 15°C, and Group 2: Baths with a water temperature above 30°C. The analgesia was the same in both groups. An analysis was made of the pain at 7 days (visual analogue scale), quality of life (SF-36), anal at-rest pressure and disease progress. Results: Of the 27 eligible patients, 24 were randomised (Group 1: n=12 y Group 2: n=12). There were no statistical differences in pain, but it remained stable in Group 1, but gradually decreased in the patients of Group 2, the difference being in the pain scores on the first day compared to the seventh in Group 2 (p=0.244). The rest of the variables were similar. Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in pain control from day 1 to day 7 in the Group with sitz baths with hot water (AU)

[Cold or hot sitz baths in the emergency treatment of acute anal pain due to anorectal disease? Results of a randomised clinical trial]. / Tratamiento del dolor anal por patología anorrectal aguda en urgencias: ¿baños de asiento con agua fría o caliente? resultados de un ensayo clínico aleatorizado.

INTRODUCTION: The popular belief advocates the use of sitz (sitting) baths with cold water for the treatment of acute anal pain, but clinical practice guides recommend the use of hot water for its known effect on the at-rest anal pressure. AIM: The objective of the study was to examine the analgesic effect on the quality of life, manometer data and clinical progress, of the two temperatures in sitz baths in patients with anal pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomised clinical trial on patients with acute anal pain due to haemorrhoids or anal fissures, divided into Group 1: Sitz baths with water at a temperature of less than 15 degrees C, and Group 2: Baths with a water temperature above 30 degrees C. The analgesia was the same in both groups. An analysis was made of the pain at 7 days (visual analogue scale), quality of life (SF-36), anal at-rest pressure and disease progress. RESULTS: Of the 27 eligible patients, 24 were randomised (Group 1: n=12 y Group 2: n=12). There were no statistical differences in pain, but it remained stable in Group 1, but gradually decreased in the patients of Group 2, the difference being in the pain scores on the first day compared to the seventh in Group 2 (p=0.244). The rest of the variables were similar. CONCLUSION: There were no statistically significant differences in pain control from day 1 to day 7 in the Group with sitz baths with hot water. (ISRCTN Number: 50105150).

Preoperative risk factors for mortality after relaparotomy: analysis of 254 patients.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work was to analyze preoperative mortality risk factors after relaparotomy for abdominal surgery in a unit of General Surgery at a University Hospital. METHODS: A total of 314 relaparotomies in 254 patients were performed between February 2004 and February 2008. We analyzed data about past medical history, first operation, as well as clinical and biochemical parameters previous to reoperation. RESULTS: Indications for relaparotomy were peritonitis, bleeding, abscess, exploratory laparotomy, and evisceration. Overall mortality was 22%. Mortality of the patients with a single relaparotomy was 20% vs. 44% if they were reoperated upon twice. Mortality was associated with age, past history of cardiovascular disease, active neoplasm, previous treatment with platelet anti-aggregant drugs, first surgery American Society of Anesthesia score, and the presence of an anastomosis. Preoperative data associated with mortality were the number of systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, suture dehiscense, ileus, positive blood cultures, mechanical ventilation, artificial nutrition, antibiotics or vasoactive drugs, tachycardia, and abnormal body temperature. High white blood cell count or bilirrubin levels and low albumin or prothrombin time were also associated with mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis isolated age (P = 0.02), abnormal body temperature (P = 0.02), and the need of mechanical ventilation (P = 0.004) as independent preoperative variables predictive for mortality after relaparotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced age, the presence of either fever or hypothermia, and the need of mechanical ventilation are preoperative risk factors associated with mortality after relaparotomy and should be considered when planning reintervention.